Titlebook: Dynamic Decision Support for Electronic Requirements Negotiations; Annika Lenz Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

nominal

Agnosia

Multilingualit?t und Monolingualit?ten different parties who seek a joint solution by exchanging information, arguments, and offers (Bichler et al. 2003). In negotiations, a multitude of decisions must be made, e.g. when to start negotiations, with whom to negotiate, which offer to formulate, etc.

Original

Was hei?t hier Parallelgesellschaft?re employed. It gets even more challenging, if negotiations must be conducted, to determine, which requirements are actually implemented and how. Requirements negotiation is an “iterative process of communication and decision making between [stakeholders] who have the overall goal of agreeing on a s

Pigeon

善辯

Assessment of Multi-Criteria Preference Measurement Methods for a Dynamic Environment, for measuring the decision maker’s preferences have been developed. The aim of preference measurement methods is to assess feasible alternatives for the decision maker to support his/her decision making.

飲料

ALE

Discussion and Outlook,knowledge contribution framework in design science research (Gregor and Hevner 2013). This thesis concludes with an outlook for future research in the field of decision support for requirements negotiations.

MELON

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31175-9Dynamic Decision Support; Electronic Requirements Negotiations; Preference Measurement; Requirements En

多樣

978-3-658-31174-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wies

舉止粗野的人

Introduction,developers, testers, future users, and maintainers) has to be taken into account (Fricker and Grünbacher 2008; Grünbacher and Seyff 2005). In the phase of requirements engineering, requirements are elicited, agreed upon, and specified (Sommerville 2012). Heterogeneous stakeholders desire different g