Titlebook: Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland; Applying the Sociolo James Dingley Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America In

Withdrawal

書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland被引頻次




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland年度引用




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland讀者反饋




書目名稱Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Femish

Durkheim as a French Nationalist, France after her shattering defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1870), the Paris Commune (1871), and the resultant turmoil and humiliation of defeat: “His experience of the French defeat may have contributed to a strong (though in no way militant) patriotism, a defensive sense of national decadence

GRATE

orient

Nations and Nationalism,ously would have been regarded as basically loose linguistic groups or provinces ruled over by metropolitan states, such as Russia or Austro-Hungary, which are now nation-states. Meanwhile, Italy and Germany were geographic and cultural expressions covering a number of independent states with no pol

項目

Ireland, the Revisionist Debate,rish history and its interpretation. Its main tools in this have been recourse to documentary evidence, contemporary witnesses, and statistical analysis and records to assess the assumptions and accepted discourse of traditional Irish (nationalist) history. In brief, it has resorted to an empirical

較早

Science and the Arts in Ireland,ery status of science itself. The revisionist argument is based heavily on the application of “scientific” concepts of objectivity and empirical data. As recent research on the history of science in Ireland indicates, such scientific ideas have a clear national, political bias (Brett, 1999; Bowler a

較早

Ireland and Nationalism,), which few modern historians would accept (McGarry, 2011). First, it was Normans who invaded twelfth-century Ireland; second, as Riordan (1990) reminds us, in pre-seventeenth-century Ireland, warfare was endemic and a Gaelic way of life, against each other as much as the Crown (who were accepted a

護身符

Crayon

Introduction: No-Where and Now-Hereteria for different societies/nations and also represent the core characteristics for his division between mechanical (Catholic nationalist) and organic (Protestant industrial), which are fundamentally incompatible because they produce truth and knowledge that contradict each other.

LUCY

Conclusion: Knowledge, Truth, and the Problem of Useless Knowledge,teria for different societies/nations and also represent the core characteristics for his division between mechanical (Catholic nationalist) and organic (Protestant industrial), which are fundamentally incompatible because they produce truth and knowledge that contradict each other.