Titlebook: Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making; Lewis Betts Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Cold War.Nucle

美麗動人

書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making被引頻次




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making年度引用




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making讀者反饋




書目名稱Duncan Sandys and British Nuclear Policy-Making讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

搖擺

Medicare

,The Ministry of Supply and the Radical Review: 1953–1954,s activities as Minister of Defence, and to ascertain the degree to which these experiences led him to become wedded to the ideas contained in his 1957 White Paper to the extent that he continued to champion them long after their impracticalities had been made apparent. In order to show the consiste

Interferons

無力更進

,The Struggle over the Nuclear Delivery System: 1957–1960, making him believe that defence was impossible. The next logical move on this trajectory was to ensure that Britain had its own ballistic missile, and by 1957 this was a viable option. The White Paper had not committed the government to Blue Streak, but Sandys intended for it to enter service, and

祖先

Blue Streak, interest. Unfortunately, most of the relevant German scientists had been captured by the United States and the Soviet Union, allowing them to effectively continue Germany’s work on unmanned weaponry, leaving Britain to make do with access to the Peenemünde team and some captured V-2s. This comparat

祖先

耕種

Katarina Ron?evi?,Marco Rieckmannand holding a number of key posts. Most significantly, he was Minister of Defence at the time of the controversial 1957 White Paper on Defence, which set out a radical vison for the future of the British military, and would have profound effects on defence policy and the defence industry in the year

性別

Chiedza N. Mutanga,Edson Gandiwa mass psychology’. He accepted that there was no evidence of ‘flying saucer aircraft’ as such, but felt that there was, nonetheless, ‘a(chǎn)mple evidence of some unfamiliar and unexplained phenomenon’. The situation seemed familiar to Sandys, who had spent a large part of the Second World War tracking th

EWER

Chiedza N. Mutanga,Edson Gandiwas activities as Minister of Defence, and to ascertain the degree to which these experiences led him to become wedded to the ideas contained in his 1957 White Paper to the extent that he continued to champion them long after their impracticalities had been made apparent. In order to show the consiste