Titlebook: Drug Testing in the Workplace; Scott Macdonald,Paul Roman Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994 ETA.Union.alcohol.alcoho

semble

串通

intoxicate

削減

workers use drugs, and that the use of some drugs can lead to industrial accidents (see Chapter 1). In some cases, authors have argued that drug testing has reduced accidents in the workplace (Bickis, Carter, Dobson, & Lees, 1987; Dupont, 1990; Kaplan, Langevin, & Ross, 1988). It is not surprising,

Counteract

(1796–7)nforcement. Testing for the presence of metabolites consistent with illegal drug use is a highly intrusive search of a person. Given the invasion of privacy resulting from any search of a person or place, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits government from conducting searches wit

APNEA

ody fluids. When the results of urine or blood tests for drugs are introduced as evidence in workplace disciplinary disputes, the central issue typically is whether the test result, or the result in combination with other evidence, provides just cause for discharge or suspension. The arbitrator is r

declamation

cohol testing as a method to identify employees who have used illicit drugs or misused alcohol and/or licit medications in contravention of the policy. Proponents of substance testing tie it to their concern for employee and public safety, and to the impacts that the use/misuse of these drugs could

sorbitol

(1797–8)joyment of personal rights and freedoms. Such is the premise of this chapter. It is adopted for the simple reason that the “principle of the least drastic means” is a fundamental, if often unstated tenet of Western liberal democracy. * As such, it should require no defense as the basis for a discuss

Hyaluronic-Acid

Outshine