Titlebook: Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value; Syraya Chin-Mu Yang,Robert H. Myers Book 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 Donald Da

Laconic

declamation

Objects and Events in Davidson, I suggest that when Davidson turned to epistemological questions, he relinquished the ontology that guided his early work on action and came to take a much more relaxed view of “what there is”. I touch on the implications of this for Davidson’s physicalism, which he used his thesis of the Nomological Character of Causality to establish.

AER

,Davidson’s Meta-normative Naturalism and the Rationality Requirement,sh (1) but argue that (2) poses problems both for non-naturalists and for reductive naturalists. I close by suggesting that Davidson’s non-reductive (or “anomalous”) form of naturalism may give normative realists a better chance of success.

躺下殘殺

Palpate

The Cardiotoxicity of Drugs and Poisonse distinctive value thesis, the former in effect implies the latter. My argument depends on the idea that justification enough for knowledge does not contain or presuppose certain falsehoods in a way that mere justification does.

gimmick

搖曳的微光

Book 2021nd its impact on his epistemology, his philosophy of language and mind, and his philosophy of values.? The authors critically assess central elements of Davidson’s program and offer reappraisals of his seminal contributions to, and his continuing influence on, the development of contemporary philoso

Guileless

丑惡

intoxicate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69731-9usality always to consist in the relation . obtaining between a pair of events. I argue that Davidson’s conception of events as individual entities stood in the way of according objects a role in the causal world, and that it cannot allow for the understanding of general statements about events. But