找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Doing the Best We Can; An Essay in Informal Fred Feldman Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 Immanuel Kant.Indi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Reticent
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:45:16 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:32:20 | 只看該作者
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:07:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0Roughly, the idea is that something is obligatory if and only if it is the best of the possibilities. This idea appears in very simple guise in the popular maxim that “you ought to do the best you can”. Classic act utilitarianism is perhaps the most famous theoretical development of the idea. On tha
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:40:03 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:36:43 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:06:01 | 只看該作者
The Lives in Front of Interfaceseratives”. While some philosophers. have apparently used the term ‘hypothetical imperative’ as little more than a stylistic variant for ‘statement of conditional obligation’, I think there is good reason to distinguish hypothetical imperatives from other iffy oughts, and to give them a separate anal
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:38:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0everal different sorts of proposition. As I see it, this fact is responsible for one of the most serious defects in the literature concerning iffy oughts. We frequently find cases in which one writer, focussing on one sort of iffy ought, proposes an analysis. He claims to have given an account of “c
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:29:27 | 只看該作者
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:54:12 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:42:14 | 只看該作者
Biases Introduced by the Algorithm Itselfral obligation, individual prudential obligation, social obligation, and civic obligation. I have also introduced and discussed some forms of “collective” obligation — group moral and prudential obligation, for example. There is also the concept of the ought-to-be. Each of these is a “doing-the-best
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-27 09:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
伊川县| 屏边| 长沙县| 班戈县| 高唐县| 兴国县| 临猗县| 怀化市| 措美县| 永胜县| 云安县| 上蔡县| 驻马店市| 宿迁市| 冀州市| 井陉县| 唐山市| 游戏| 临泽县| 基隆市| 富川| 湘乡市| 河西区| 崇文区| 钦州市| 石嘴山市| 思茅市| 右玉县| 武隆县| 新昌县| 海兴县| 秭归县| 吉木乃县| 盐山县| 佛山市| 呈贡县| 明水县| 榕江县| 万全县| 象州县| 冕宁县|