找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃，訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Does Truth Matter?; Democracy and Public Raf Geenens,Ronald Tinnevelt Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Democracy.Epistem

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 36362|回復(fù): 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:48:49 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?
副標(biāo)題Democracy and Public
編輯Raf Geenens,Ronald Tinnevelt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/283/282361/282361.mp4
概述Comprehensive overview of the debate on democracy, power and globalisation.Presents different aspects as a coherent whole, instead of as discrete issues.Integrates thinking about the principles of dem
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Does Truth Matter?; Democracy and Public Raf Geenens,Ronald Tinnevelt Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Democracy.Epistem
描述.The claim once made by philosophers of unique knowledge of the essence of humanity and society has fallen into disrepute. Neither Platonic forms, divine revelation nor metaphysical truth can serve as the ground for legitimating social and political norms. On the political level many seem to agree that democracy doesn’t need foundations. Nor are its citizens expected to discuss the worth of their comprehensive conceptions of the good life. According to Rawls, for example, we have to accept that “politics in a democratic society can never be guided by what we see as the whole truth (…)”. (1993: 243) And yet we still call upon truth when we participate in defining the basic structure our society and argue why our opinions, beliefs and preferences need to be taken seriously. We do not think that our views need to be taken into account by others because they are our views, but because we think they are true. If in a democratic society citizens have to deal with the challenge of affirming their claims as true, we need to analyse the precise relationship between truth and democracy. Does truth matter to democracy and if so, what is the place of truth in democratic politics? How can citiz
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Democracy; Epistemology; John Rawls; Liberalism; Plato; Pragmatism; Public Sphere; Truth; logic; politics; res
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8849-0
isbn_softcover978-90-481-8004-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-8849-0
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Does Truth Matter?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:51:22 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:29:38 | 只看該作者
Truth and Democracy: Pragmatism and the Deliberative Virtuesthe things it takes to be valuable — freedom of association, freedom of speech, listening to the views of others, expanding public spaces in which open debate can flourish, etc. Why should we value open debate and discussion over private decision-making and then voting, over bargaining, or over elim
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:41:37 | 只看該作者
Folk Epistemology and the Justification of Democracyr that action on the part of both the government and the citizenry is constrained by a set of rules speci?fied in a public constitution. This constitution contains procedural provisions not only for holding elections, dividing authority, checking power, and punishing abuses, but also for its own rev
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:23:00 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:11:02 | 只看該作者
Truth and Trust in Democratic Epistemologyly aggregating the preferences or opinions of participants and toward the claim that these powers flow from deliberation, viewed as a constitutive element of democracy. This chapter reviews a version of this perspective, drawing on sources in pragmatist political philosophy, and tries to develop it,
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:18:11 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:47:13 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:32:47 | 只看該作者
Cities as Spaces of Democracy: Complexity, Scale, and Governance and are also favoured objects of study that connect geography with other social science disciplines. Moreover, the city has a particular place in Western thought about democracy. This is because of the iconic status of classical Greek, medieval Italian and other city-states in debates about the ori
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:02:55 | 只看該作者
Semi-public Spaces: The Spatial Logic of Institutionshat may be called ‘the crisis of place’.1 The importance of place, as an inte grative and stabilising force in human experience, is waning. Our experiences of time and space, work, communication and social relations are increasingly becoming mediated by a series of devices and systems that diminish
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-15 20:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
满城县| 临城县| 舞钢市| 茌平县| 都昌县| 乾安县| 九江市| 鲁山县| 蒙城县| 阳新县| 冕宁县| 安泽县| 五华县| 德钦县| 乐业县| 资中县| 宜丰县| 金华市| 东辽县| 渭南市| 双桥区| 监利县| 达尔| 福海县| 胶州市| 阿克苏市| 济南市| 和政县| 蓝山县| 平谷区| 平远县| 嘉兴市| 文安县| 安阳县| 海淀区| 宁德市| 武鸣县| 东乡族自治县| 湘西| 灵石县| 东宁县|