Titlebook: Doctors, Honour and the Law; Medical Ethics in Im Andreas-Holger Maehle Book 2009 Andreas-Holger Maehle 2009 ethics.Germany.medical ethics.

哥哥大傻瓜

書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law被引頻次




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law年度引用




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Doctors, Honour and the Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

initiate

有權(quán)威

Patient Information and Consent: Self-Determination versus Paternalism,n area where a conflict between doctors’ and lawyers’ differing conceptions of the therapeutic relationship was played out was the issue of patient consent to medical interventions, in particular to surgical operations. This chapter traces the debate on this issue from its beginnings in the early 18

Audiometry

Duties and Habitus of a Doctor: The Literature on Medical Ethics,ially to the Hippocratic Oath (.. 400 .).. In many periods, such writing has been employed not only to provide ethical guidance for medical practitioners, but also to demarcate their conduct from that of other (often rival) healers and to introduce young doctors to forms of ‘prudent’ behaviour vis-à

scrape

先行

先行

A. Perl,V. Colova-Tsolova,Y. Eshdatppocratic Oath (.. 400 .).. This demand was so frequently repeated in the literature on medical duties that it became constitutive of the doctor’s ideal ‘habitus’ and self-image (see Chapter 4). From the modern period, it was also endorsed by legislation. The Prussian Medical Edict of 1725, for exam

comely

A. Perl,V. Colova-Tsolova,Y. Eshdatn area where a conflict between doctors’ and lawyers’ differing conceptions of the therapeutic relationship was played out was the issue of patient consent to medical interventions, in particular to surgical operations. This chapter traces the debate on this issue from its beginnings in the early 18

內(nèi)疚

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-494-0ially to the Hippocratic Oath (.. 400 .).. In many periods, such writing has been employed not only to provide ethical guidance for medical practitioners, but also to demarcate their conduct from that of other (often rival) healers and to introduce young doctors to forms of ‘prudent’ behaviour vis-à

Annotate