Titlebook: Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU; Vesna Rijavec,Wendy Kennett,Tja?a Ivanc Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

欺侮

書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU被引頻次




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU年度引用




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU讀者反饋




書目名稱Diversity of Enforcement Titles in the EU讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Pericarditis

Enforcement Titles in the EU: Common Core After All?vil law systems of Europe. The authors employed a comparative analysis, which demonstrated that the existing lines of difference among the national laws are neither particularly deep nor static. At the functional level, there was no finding off any differences with dramatical consequences. This woul

Rheumatologist

gruelling

Comparative View on the Divergence of Structure and Substance of Judgementsr procedures, the participants in such proceedings regularly encounter foreign enforcement titles drafted in an unfamiliar language and form. While difficulties arising from the use of language can be overcome by translation, the unfamiliar structure of enforcement titles remains another significant

險代理人

Comparative Issues Concerning the Determination of Interestn. Of relevance in the context of European cooperation in civil and commercial matters is the need to ensure a clear and unambiguous enforcement procedure in each Member State, which requires transparent rules on how adjudicated or settled interest is to be calculated. In practice, difficulties in d

小口啜飲

小口啜飲

CHIDE

Pendency Rulesidentity ratione materiae’ of two claims. Even the language versions of the provision of Article?29 Brussels I bis Regulation reflect different national approaches using wording the of ‘same cause of action’, ‘same claim’ and even two elements, namely ‘same object and same cause of action’. The CJEU

兩種語言

Related Actionshe nuances of the autonomous understanding of the concept, both regarding the relatedness of actions and the powers of the national courts to stay proceedings. The authors demonstrate that gaps in the conceptual understanding of the rules contribute to an underutilization of said rules. The chapter

OTTER