Titlebook: Distributive Justice and Inequality; A Selection of Paper Wulf Gaertner,Prasanta K. Pattanaik Conference proceedings 1988 Springer-Verlag B

magnify

書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality被引頻次




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality年度引用




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality讀者反饋




書目名稱Distributive Justice and Inequality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

漫步

senschaftskolleg zu Berlin). More than thirty scholars participated in this conference. The topics of the presentations ranged from ethics, welfare economics and social choice theory to characterizations of inequality meas- ures and redistributive taxation schemes. This book contains a selection of

滲入

Parallel

作嘔

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30033-5 family and Generalized Ginis) and of some new more general classes of indices. The whole derivation is based on weak assumptions. In an ordinal framework only continuity of the underlying ordering is required and no cardinal properties are employed.

dragon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30033-5cept of absolute inequality). The intermediate concepts studied here have the property that multiples of convex combinations of proportional and absolute changes (in all incomes) leave inequality unchanged.

dragon

Repatriate

Consequentialist Demographic Norms and Parenting Rights,y poor people may be desirable can be avoided by denying that individuals’ interests extend to the circumstances of their birth. But it is better avoided by recognizing that potential parents have legitimate interests concerning the sizes of their families.

perpetual

Poverty Orderings and Welfare Dominance,rty standard is allowed to take any positive value, and these orderings are shown to coincide with the natural interpretation of first, second and third degree “welfare dominance”, respectively. Additional results are then obtained for the situation in which the admissible poverty lines cannot exceed some finite upper bound.

lymphedema

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30033-5t interchange their ranks. A definition of tax progressivity based on the shown equivalence is suggested. It is demonstrated that inequality reducing taxation is equivalent to progressive taxation in the sense of an increasing average tax rate if and only if the concept of relative inequality is used.