找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開始

掃一掃，訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Discussing Trump’s America Online; Digital Commenting i Vera Slavtcheva-Petkova Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 32351|回復(fù): 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:38:29 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online
副標(biāo)題Digital Commenting i
編輯Vera Slavtcheva-Petkova
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/282/281246/281246.mp4
概述Focuses on three countries – China, Mexico and Russia – and their relationship with the USA.Introduces the novel concept of post-deliberative public spheres.Explores themes such as identity, patriotis
圖書封面Titlebook: Discussing Trump’s America Online; Digital Commenting i Vera Slavtcheva-Petkova Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),
描述.This book offers a novel, grounded-theory approach to the study of online comments about Donald Trump and the USA in countries with a turbulent relation with America: China, Mexico and Russia...Slavtcheva-Petkova advocates for a departure from Jürgen Habermas’s public sphere and democratic deliberative framework, introducing instead the concept of post-deliberative public spheres. The book provides a qualitative thematic analysis via the constant comparison method, coupled with quantitate content analysis of more than 2200 social media comments posted from Trump’s election in 2016 until July 2020. Three empirical chapters are devoted to the countries under study, showing how it is possible to map the comments onto a spectrum of authoritarianism/censored media to democracy/free media. Slavtcheva-Petkova argues that existence and strength of an underpinning ideology and the scope that ideology leaves for constructive political discussions online is of key importance, exploring themes such as identity, patriotism and populism; democracy; power and responsibility...Timely and innovative, ‘Trump’s America Online’ astutely displays how post-deliberative public spheres are valuable space
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞Donald Trump; USA; social media; public sphere; democracy; Habermas; trade war; Putin; Argumentation
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18980-7
isbn_softcover978-3-031-18982-1
isbn_ebook978-3-031-18980-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online被引頻次




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online年度引用




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online讀者反饋




書目名稱Discussing Trump’s America Online讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:14:59 | 只看該作者
Online Comments About Trump and the USA in Russiaity of argumentation was low, but engagement, especially with other users, was significantly higher than in China. Incivility was rare. Three patterns of discussion were identified: (1) Echoing the official narrative. (2) Challenging the official narrative, and criticizing the political system and l
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:51:01 | 只看該作者
Conclusiononstructive political discussions online are of key importance. Thus, the post-deliberative public spheres are fluid, versatile, and with a very strong nationalist focus, playing into current national political narratives and propaganda efforts, thus in all cases also serving in one way or another t
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:49:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:21:33 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:13:07 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1160-4ity of argumentation was low, but engagement, especially with other users, was significantly higher than in China. Incivility was rare. Three patterns of discussion were identified: (1) Echoing the official narrative. (2) Challenging the official narrative, and criticizing the political system and l
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:38:00 | 只看該作者
Sustainable Food Waste Managementonstructive political discussions online are of key importance. Thus, the post-deliberative public spheres are fluid, versatile, and with a very strong nationalist focus, playing into current national political narratives and propaganda efforts, thus in all cases also serving in one way or another t
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:28:19 | 只看該作者
themes such as identity, patriotism and populism; democracy; power and responsibility...Timely and innovative, ‘Trump’s America Online’ astutely displays how post-deliberative public spheres are valuable space978-3-031-18982-1978-3-031-18980-7
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:07:30 | 只看該作者
S. K. Srivastava,Deepthi Kolady,Sudipta Pauly—the usefulness of online political talk as a means of enhancing democracy. Instead, a new term is introduced—post-deliberative public spheres(s), defined as a placeholder for spaces for open discussions among members of different publics that have the capacity to contribute to politics and policy-making.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:49:15 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 00:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
陕西省| 湛江市| 凉城县| 河间市| 徐闻县| 射洪县| 阿合奇县| 页游| 微博| 旬阳县| 大方县| 兴业县| 民乐县| 尼玛县| 崇文区| 改则县| 阳信县| 尤溪县| 舟山市| 灵寿县| 茂名市| 疏勒县| 邵阳市| 霸州市| 清流县| 芦山县| 康平县| 松滋市| 巴里| 康平县| 保靖县| 彰化市| 永春县| 永泰县| 浦县| 绿春县| 兰州市| 洛川县| 贵定县| 巫溪县| 凯里市|