找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience; Psychology, Neurophy Gerhard Benetka,Hans Werbik Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48764|回復(fù): 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:21:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience
副標(biāo)題Psychology, Neurophy
編輯Gerhard Benetka,Hans Werbik
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/282/281243/281243.mp4
概述Main points of criticism against the generalizations of neuroscientific research are explained.The viewpoint of phenomenological psychology, which is less common in the US-American discussion, is pres
叢書名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology
圖書封面Titlebook: Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience; Psychology, Neurophy Gerhard Benetka,Hans Werbik Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(
描述.The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and – if possible – considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. ..?.
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Cognitive Neuroscience; Phenomenology; Cultural Psychology; Biological Psychology; Philosophical critiqu
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-71042-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-71040-8Series ISSN 0747-5241 Series E-ISSN 2512-2207
issn_series 0747-5241
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience被引頻次




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience年度引用




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience讀者反饋




書目名稱Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:13:23 | 只看該作者
Correction to: Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience: Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on th
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:56:46 | 只看該作者
Book 2021interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. ..?.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:23:21 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:28:59 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:59:45 | 只看該作者
0747-5241 which is less common in the US-American discussion, is pres.The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdiscip
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:58:31 | 只看該作者
“,”: The EU Plan for a Green Transitiona matter of maximizing profits. By now humans themselves are subjected to this movement as well. The rise of neurosciences means the expansion of instrumental access by also subjecting the mind to this calculation of availability through the study of the brain.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:07:35 | 只看該作者
,Living Body or Physical Dataset? Antonio Damsio’s and Thomas Fuchs’s Holistic Conception of the Hum is made accessible for certain purposes. In an economic system based on competition, everything is a matter of competitive advantages and ultimately a matter of maximizing profits. By now humans themselves are subjected to this movement as well. The rise of neurosciences means the expansion of inst
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:28:59 | 只看該作者
Persistent Biologism and the Misuse of Neuropsychology: An Activity Theoretical Contribution,ategory mistakes but elaborates in particular on what Bennett und Hacker have called a mereological fallacy: the neuroscientists’ mistake of ascribing attributes to the constituent parts of an animal that logically apply only to the whole animal.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:34:35 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 06:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
扶绥县| 太仓市| 庆元县| 安岳县| 布尔津县| 什邡市| 西贡区| 伊金霍洛旗| 华容县| 岐山县| 泸定县| 比如县| 金阳县| 郁南县| 谷城县| 灵石县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 龙胜| 夹江县| 荥阳市| 双辽市| 藁城市| 潼关县| 徐汇区| 黄平县| 舒兰市| 阿克苏市| 丰镇市| 拉萨市| 龙游县| 海丰县| 山东| 阳东县| 高要市| 黔南| 乌兰县| 奎屯市| 大丰市| 凉城县| 特克斯县| 霍城县|