Titlebook: Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice; The Theory and Appli T. Price Caldwell,Oliver Cresswell,Robert J. Stain Book 2018 Springer Inte

果園

書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

無(wú)表情

Molecular Sememics: Toward A Model of an Ordinary Language shows how in ordinary language it is this brief moment of choice, this “molecule”, that is in fact the sememe, the fundamental unit of meaning. This molecule is created in momentary discourse, existing before conventionalization ‘fixes’ its terms, and failing to notice this gives the false impressi

notification

Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese (The Molecular Sememe: Some Implications for Semantics)‘mentalese’, a purely formal manipulation of logical concepts that then correlate to words. Contrary to the linguistic relativist hypothesis, all languages are fundamentally equal in this, and though the words may differ the thinking is the same. Here though, Caldwell proposes a different view, draw

包租車船

The Coerciveness of Discourse around discourse, he distinguishes between two kinds: discourse in the . sense?– a set of semantic relationships that become conventionalised through continuous use in the same way; and discourse in the . sense?– a particular act of speech, writing, or conversation that takes place ‘within’ a disco

有說(shuō)服力

Molecular Sememics (Unfinished Book Manuscript)and he begins by presenting his motivation for the theory. It has the potential for explaining many facts about language, which, when taken together, are difficult to explain consistently within the current orthodoxies of linguistic study. Caldwell stresses that such an explanation can be found by f

無(wú)能力之人

無(wú)能力之人

The Rhetoric of Plain Fact: Stevens’ “No Possum, No Sop, No Taters”lly on the ontological connections between language and perception unearthed in the poetry of Wallace Stevens. By implicitly utilizing his theory of Molecular Sememics, Caldwell aims to show that Stevens’ concern with poems that truly capture the phenomenology of experience offers a perfect example

debris

American Shoot-Out: Hemingway vs. Richard Forde used as an aid for literary criticism. In commenting on the two authors’ styles, Caldwell notes that while Hemingway attempts to reify his words since he knows they will be distrusted as mere symbols, and Ford distrusts the words and categories he’s inherited as an author, both take up what Caldwe

Osteoarthritis

What I Have Learned About English from Being in Japan (Or: Why Can’t Japanese Students of English Maakers of English provided supporting evidence for his theory of Molecular Sememics. Beginning with a discussion of the misuse of the determiners “a” and “the” by Japanese speakers of English, Caldwell finds that instead of systematic or syntactic rules being violated, it is a misunderstanding of the

judicial

Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice978-3-319-75441-3Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X