Titlebook: Discourse and Conflict; Analysing Text and T Innocent Chiluwa Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

HARD

Outwit

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280955.jpg

DEBT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07587-7cts, wars and political violence around the world. With the understanding that language mirrors a society’s shared meaning, which enables them to make sense of the world, the study of language use (or discourse) will provide an important “entry point” for investigating how members of a society or gr

龍卷風

ovation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07590-7merous national and local bodies worldwide. Although the document describes itself as “non-legally binding,” it has been characterized as a “quasi-law, in which capacity it exercises the . authority of the law, without having acquired legal legitimacy” (Gould, 2018: 1). This chapter subjects the IHR

可耕種

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07590-7scuss the relationship between political discourse, hate speech and metaphor, bringing metaphor studies closer to populism studies. Secondly, we analyze metaphorical and metonymical multimodality in five cartoons depicting the two presidents. As a conclusion, we found out that both presidents employ

Estrogen

Yacine A?t-Sahalia,Per A. Mykland,Lan Zhangspeech (HS). Building on previous work [Ruzait?. In Search of Hate Speech. . 14(1): 93–116 (2018). 10.1515/lpp-2018-0005], this study applies the framework of Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis to investigate a database of over 10,000 comments written on controversial issues. The results reveal some

Distribution

Svetlana Borovkova,Ferry Jaya Permanaigate discursive patterns in the “grey zone” between legal offence and freedom of speech. From a corpus of . and .k messages dispersed by politicians before and during the 2019 election campaign in Flanders, we collected 195 posts that we consider to belong to this in-between area. We identified fou

激勵

推測

GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciencescertain knowledge that shapes the Macedonian identity. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used to identify the users’ ideological constructions, hatred as an argument, Christianity as part of Macedonian identity, and the economic fight as discourses in more than 3500 comments on 76 YouTube videos