Titlebook: Disability and Technology; An Interdisciplinary Alan Roulstone Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Disability st

Functional

Anticlimax

動(dòng)脈

The Wheelchair: Enabled or Disabled? Houston, We’ve Had a Problemng with technologies. These risks are both physical in the case of limb lengthening surgery (Kitoh et al. 2014) or involve social risk in the sense of uncertain social response, for example as is the case with neuroprosthesis or exoskeleton developments (Breen 2015; Musicus and Davis 2013; Schearer

為現(xiàn)場(chǎng)

過(guò)份好問(wèn)

細(xì)絲

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28955-3lbrecht et al. 2001; Barnes et al. 1999; Ellul and Merton 1964; Goodley 2010; Heidegger 1977; Thomas 2007; Verbeek 2011; Wajcman 2010; Watson et al. 2012). However, the key debates and implications for understanding the intersections of disability and technology are required. There are, however, som

FRAX-tool

Interim

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30090-5 spatial transactions and the size of transactions that may once have been large, paper-based and physically demanding. Stonier is important here in noting that such changes go beyond simple mechanised technologies which extended human musculature to the extension of human neurology, cognition, data

整潔

Statistik, Daten und statistische Methodenare driving forward access to and use of telecare, before looking at the barriers (and sometimes antipathy) towards the take-up of such technologies and the implications for future design, procurement and support of such technologies. I will also argue that telecare risks being seen as a new panacea

Self-Help-Group