Titlebook: Digital Carnivalesque; Power Discourse and Hoi-Yi Katy Kan Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 critical discourse analysis.c

Daidzein

書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque被引頻次




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque年度引用




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque讀者反饋




書目名稱Digital Carnivalesque讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

真

Power,, a discipline-bounded approach alone to understanding the nature of power is inadequate. What is needed is a review of key classical works on power so as to propose a unified understanding of power that evidences the robust nature of power more precisely. With this in place, the systematic empirica

聯(lián)邦

Digital Times,al economy as simultaneously layered, multifaceted, convergent, and in constant flux. This generative complexion can be attributed to the emergence of newer social conditions associated with the digital epoch as well as dramaturgical concerns in everyday practices. In particular, this chapter focuse

出汗

Politics and Social Media in Singapore, the country’s tightly regulated media spaces, the expression of free speech is considerably curbed in the eyes of its critics. It is therefore timely to interrogate the agency of its people in enacting voice in the digital vernacular discourse, particularly in the online subpolitical terrain. By de

septicemia

PRO

PRO

,Anton Casey’s Mistake (Singlish 55), second video. The first three parts are similar to the previous chapter. They include the part on the carnivalesque form of the mediatized performance. This is further split into the use of semiotic resources and the aspect of grotesque realism as carnivalesque tools. The second part focuses on the

陳腐思想

Power As Constantly Reconstituting and the Prospects of Carnivalesque Politics,ness of Foucauldian governmentality as a theory of power in explicating the modus operandi of Singapore’s PAP government in curbing free speech in the country’s media space. I then move on to examine the limitations of Foucauldian governmentality and Bourdieusian cultural perspective specifically in

四海為家的人

交響樂