Titlebook: Did Darwin Get It Right?; Essays on Games, Sex John Maynard Smith Book 1988 John Maynard Smith 1988 Charles Darwin.Darwin.behavior.biology.

mutineer

Bas van Stein,Wojtek Kowalczyk,Thomas B?cktransformed by contact with evolutionary biology, in the same way as, in the immediate past, biology has been transformed by contact with chemistry. Human nature, like the nature of ants, hunting dogs or primroses, is the product of evolution by natural selection. It does not vanish with the appeara

Nerve-Block

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40581-0e problem with prejudices, but he tries harder and more successfully than most to rise above them. Prejudices are inevitable. It is natural for geneticists and evolutionary biologists to hope that their disciplines will throw new light on the human condition, and equally natural for social scientist

vertebrate

Hallmark

漂亮才會豪華

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50146-4y anyone prepared to make a serious effort. . was unusual in that, although written as a popular account, it made an original contribution to biology. Further, the contribution itself was of an unusual kind. Unlike David Lack’s classic . — also an original contribution in popular form — . reports no

EXCEL

Zoé Krug,Romain Guillaume,Olga Batta?ahe most famous and fruitful example of borrowing by biologists of an idea from the human sciences was the use made, by both Darwin and Wallace, of Malthus’s picture of human competition for resources as a foundation for their own theory of evolution by natural selection. At a less exalted level, I h

TIGER

Zoé Krug,Romain Guillaume,Olga Batta?as the current contribution of palaeontology to evolutionary theory. It might be supposed that this contribution would be crucial, but, at least until recently, that has not been so. The palaeontologist G. G. Simpson was one of the main architects of the ‘modern synthesis’ that emerged in the 1940s,

條街道往前推

Marco Baioletti,Andrea Capotortilive socially, and so on. These problems are, in the main, debated within the shared assumptions of ‘neo-Darwinism’ or ‘the modern synthesis’. Recently, however, a group of palaeontologists, of whom Gould, Eldredge and Stanley have been the most prominent, have announced that the modern synthesis is

SYN

Venules

The Birth of Sociobiologyression of women. For still others, it is an attempt to reform and revitalise anthropology by an infusion of ideas from biology. The origin of this confusion lies in the publication, ten years ago, of E. O. Wilson’s book, ..