找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism; René Provost,Colleen Sheppard Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Comm

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 14775|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:57:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism
編輯René Provost,Colleen Sheppard
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/271/270922/270922.mp4
概述First volume to bring together authors with established track records in legal pluralism and human rights.Explores ways in which legal pluralism and human rights can mutually reinforcing, de-legitimiz
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism;  René Provost,Colleen Sheppard Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Comm
描述Human rights have transformed the way in which we conceive the place of the individual within the community and in relation to the state in a vast array of disciplines, including law, philosophy, politics, sociology, geography. The published output on human rights over the last five decades has been enormous, but has remained tightly bound to a notion of human rights as dialectically linking the individual and the state. Because of human rights’ dogged focus on the state and its actions, they have very seldom attracted the attention of legal pluralists. Indeed, some may have viewed the two as simply incompatible or relating to wholly distinct phenomena. This collection of essays is the first to bring together authors with established track records in the fields of legal pluralism and human rights, to explore the ways in which these concepts can be mutually reinforcing, delegitimizing, or competing. The essays reveal that there is no facile conclusion to reach but that the question opens avenues which are likely to be mined for years to come by those interested in how human rights can affect the behaviour of individuals and institutions.
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞Communities and Local Practice; Diversity and Human Rights; Fragmentation of International; Human Right
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4
isbn_softcover978-94-007-9812-0
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4710-4Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:13:48 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:40:18 | 只看該作者
International Human Rights and Global Legal Pluralism: A Research Agendaation of a diversity of legal orders. This is the “bottom up” version of legal pluralism, one that emphasizes how legal pluralism both challenges and (thus) produces international human rights law. These two meaning are in some ways radically distinct and even in some ways incompatible, but can also
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:22:48 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:29:56 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:23:02 | 只看該作者
Wives’ Tales on Research in Bountifuly presumed preference of state over cultural “l(fā)aw. while at the same time rigourously testing claims about gender and tradition grounded in cultural norms. Applying this inquiry to the study of polygamy in Bountiful, British Columbia, should serve to enrich our understanding of how women are affecte
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:54:26 | 只看該作者
Book 2013 competing. The essays reveal that there is no facile conclusion to reach but that the question opens avenues which are likely to be mined for years to come by those interested in how human rights can affect the behaviour of individuals and institutions.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:09:06 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:06:46 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:26:33 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 02:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
茶陵县| 庆安县| 永兴县| 新平| 游戏| 武山县| 盐源县| 宁阳县| 当雄县| 丰镇市| 灯塔市| 河东区| 大余县| 桂阳县| 潢川县| 雷州市| 陆川县| 阳朔县| 盐边县| 延长县| 陇南市| 丰原市| 开远市| 呈贡县| 汝南县| 北安市| 黄大仙区| 灵丘县| 民乐县| 洪泽县| 吴旗县| 闽侯县| 昌江| 醴陵市| 仁怀市| 金坛市| 平潭县| 利川市| 黔西县| 镇雄县| 曲水县|