Titlebook: Developments in British Politics 4; Patrick Dunleavy (Professor of Government),Andrew Textbook 1993Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Li

Monroe

書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4被引頻次




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4年度引用




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4讀者反饋




書目名稱Developments in British Politics 4讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

aerobic

概觀

Inkling

Environmental Politicsittle attention. The major political parties lacked coherent or comprehensive environmental policies, and while public attention continued to focus on areas of traditionally greater prominence, such as foreign and economic policy, the environment remained little understood and barely regarded by central or local government.

famine

http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/270168.jpg

COST

COST

過多

Kenneth W. White,Feng Yu,Yi Fang politics at the end of 1992, but are also integral to the future of Britain in all key spheres. Despite the events of ‘Black Wednesday’, when under intense speculative pressure sterling was withdrawn from the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) of the European Monetary System (EMS), Britain’s economic fo

mercenary

Ultra High Temperature Ceramic Compositesical change and how power is exercised in the UK. During the 1992 general election the primary focus as far as most of the London media was concerned was which of the two main parties, Conservative or Labour, would form the next government at Westminster. But in other parts of the UK, particularly i

幻想

https://doi.org/10.1007/b104068 a fourth consecutive time, though with a drastically reduced majority (see Table 1) — is open to two radically different interpretations. The first regards it as a reversion to the two-party system of the 1960s and emphasises the scale of Labour’s advance. It points to Labour’s gain in seats (its l