Titlebook: Development Aid in Russia; Lessons from Siberia Judith Marquand Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 20

爆發(fā)

書目名稱Development Aid in Russia影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia被引頻次




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia年度引用




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia讀者反饋




書目名稱Development Aid in Russia讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

overbearing

食物

The Russian Context to be designed, implemented and appraised with full regard to context. The Russian context from 1991 to 2006 was a complex, turbulent one. This chapter provides background for Part II’s accounts of proj ects..

Aspiration

AGONY

The UK Know How Fund and SEPS ProgrammesGovernment. In no case did the budget exceed ￡50,000. So we should not expect information flows and control mechanisms as elaborate as those for the TEMPUS TACIS projects of several hundred thousand euros. But the same questions about the nature of the policy and implementation are relevant. So this

averse

Management Development for TSU Library, 1994–8ing, I went for the first time through the park gates and into the long white building of TSU, up the great marble staircase to the first floor, and along the marble corridors. They had not been redecorated for many decades; the fine bones of the building were almost concealed by the drabness of its

averse

Lipoma

Atmosphere

Sustainable Development in Omsk, 2002–3 and 2005 course on developing distance-learning courses. Two of each team were distance-learning experts; the third was a university teacher with an interest in the content of the degree. I took these four visitors on a three-day visit to Yorkshire and Teesside to see UK environmental policy in action. The

尊敬

Lessons for Donorsart II met Scott’s criteria for success. But these successes were often not what the donors had explicitly intended. Indeed, it is arguable that the projects could only succeed because they lay outside the mainstream of their donors’ concerns.