Titlebook: Design Anthropology; Object Culture in th Alison J. Clarke Book 2011Latest edition Springer-Verlag Vienna 2011 Anthropology.Architecture.Ar

BULB

書目名稱Design Anthropology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Design Anthropology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Design Anthropology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Design Anthropology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Design Anthropology被引頻次




書目名稱Design Anthropology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Design Anthropology年度引用




書目名稱Design Anthropology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Design Anthropology讀者反饋




書目名稱Design Anthropology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

疲憊的老馬

伙伴

Kristy L. Archuleta,Emily A. Burrhetics, and its interactions. No longer bound to the outdated fiction of the Fordist product, a logical object borne of rational technological means and eagerly adopted by the novelty-hungry consumer, theorization around ‘stuff’ has seen an exponential increase. But the ‘turn to the material’, as so

傳授知識

軌道

Abutment

Abutment

Classical Analysis of Interest Rates ethnographic methods linked to ‘thinking thief’ and ‘user’ in order to generate designs against crime. Second, by analyzing strategies used by a variety of artists, designers, entrepreneurs, and criminals that involve opportunism and visually focused modus operandi. Finally, the paper considers the

Confound

Deflation and Inflation Dynamics with Debtich the design profession questioned its social and ecological role in the making of commodities. The emergence of a critical design culture that sought to strip away the layers of ‘false’ meaning around commercial products, indigenous objects, and anthropology came to offer an alternative model of

極力證明

perpetual