Titlebook: Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems; 25th IFIP WG 1.02 In Henning Bordihn,Nicholas Tran,Gy?rgy Vaszil Conference proceedings 2023 IF

落后的煤渣

書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems被引頻次




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems年度引用




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems讀者反饋




書目名稱Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

歡騰

觀察

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6076-9em (a .-complete problem that is very convenient to prove the .-hardness of reversible games with pushing blocks). Direct use of this property introduces an explosion in the number of gadgets needed to show .-hardness, but we show how to bring that number from 32 down to only three in general, and d

自然環(huán)境

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6076-9s in an accepting computation on . that uses least nondeterminism. The universal width of . on string . is the least number of parallel branches an accepting computation of . on . uses. The existential or universal width of . is said to be finite if it is bounded for all accepted strings. We show th

Coronary-Spasm

Expertise

Expertise

Field Manual of Diseases on Trees and Shrubsops at an identity state. We show that, for this presentation of finite groups, the uniform word problem is .-complete. Here, the input consists of a finitary automaton together with a finite state sequence and the question is whether the sequence acts trivially on all input words. Additionally, we

伴隨而來

Inferior

Field Manual of Diseases on Trees and Shrubsed if there is exactly one accepting path in its computation tree. If there are none or more than one accepting paths, the input is rejected. It turns out that, from a descriptional complexity point of view, .s differ significantly from the known types of finite automata. In particular the state cos

驚惶