Titlebook: Derrida and Phenomenology; William R. McKenna,J. Claude Evans Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Edmund Husserl.Jacq

insipid

伙伴

符合你規(guī)定

LARK

A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzercise of the art it mimics. Yet, to be successful as parody, it must provide sufficient clues for the discerning reader to grasp its satirical character. Otherwise, it remains an undetected, therefore unappreciated, hoax.

無價(jià)值

A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzewhy discuss deconstruction at all? Deconstruction is, after all, a part of the “post-modernist contribution” that, according to an article in a recent academic journal, is itself nothing more that “a spectacular PR maneuver” that has “succeeded in repackaging and marketing—especially in English Depa

fluffy

遺留之物

A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzenting to understand him—none, for instance, claim to do anything as extraordinary as “deconstruction”—none adhere to one of the most basic hermeneutical rules: reconstruct the context. Because critics neglect the context, some charge Derrida with interpreting Husserlian phenomenology merely as ontol

Flatter

巨碩

干涉