Titlebook: Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings; Risto Hilpinen Book 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971 deonti

Lasting

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08940-6predicates, we shall in this paper use the uppercase letters ., C, …, ., …. The reader may think of them as standing for some (unspecified) properties and relations of human acts. It is important to realize, and to keep in mind, that these letters do not represent individual acts, but stand for cert

詩集

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0069742isholm criticizes some systems of so-called deontic logic, among them the system proposed by me in 1951,. on the ground that they are unable to cope with this normative idea. He also makes some positive suggestions concerning the logical structure of the imperatives in question.

Perennial長期的

VALID

相容

intelligible

entreat

An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,] and [19]. The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure of these logics.

哄騙

disparage

finite