找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Deontic Logic and Normative Systems; 12th International C Fabrizio Cariani,Davide Grossi,Xavier Parent Conference proceedings 2014 Springer

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 佯攻
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 09:52:50 | 只看該作者
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 13:16:15 | 只看該作者
A Preference-Based Semantics for CTD Reasoning,r we fill the gap and define a suitable possible-world semantics for the system for which we can prove soundness and completeness. The semantics is a preference-based non-normal one extending and generalizing semantics for classical modal logics.
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 19:50:08 | 只看該作者
Proof Analysis in Deontic Logics,cidable. Then we show that our calculi are equivalent to the axiomatic ones, and therefore that they are sound and complete w.r.t. neighborhood semantics. This is a major step in the development of the proof theory of deontic logics since our calculi allow for a systematic root-first proof search of formal derivations.
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 22:32:16 | 只看該作者
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 01:08:44 | 只看該作者
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 05:27:17 | 只看該作者
A Deontic Logic of Actions and States, the two kinds refer to obligatory, permitted and forbidden actions or states. In the paper we start from presenting a simple deontic logic of actions and a simple deontic logic of states. Then we combine them to provide a unified logic of general norms. Finally, we discuss the way in which specific norms can be introduced into the system.
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 09:34:54 | 只看該作者
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 15:34:40 | 只看該作者
Gary A. Gudelsky,Bryan K. Yamamotontic logic. Second we introduce a new semantics for the obligations capable of representing and reasoning about them in these dynamic settings, and lastly we use it to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to identify conflicting obligations.
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 18:57:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376472ing can be derived from the prescriptive one. A dynamic, non truth-functional semantics for necessity deontic modals is developed, in which the ideality relations among possible worlds can be updated. Finally, it is proven that the semantics solves several of the classic deontic paradoxes.
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 22:47:57 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 10:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
井冈山市| 苗栗县| 临沂市| 安达市| 沂水县| 天门市| 枣庄市| 藁城市| 琼结县| 衡东县| 乐东| 仙游县| 岳池县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 仁怀市| 建阳市| 同德县| 沁水县| 广德县| 大冶市| 林周县| 巴林右旗| 新乡市| 钟山县| 定日县| 泽普县| 墨江| 扎兰屯市| 舒兰市| 桓台县| 铁岭市| 集贤县| 虹口区| 铜山县| 治多县| 甘肃省| 台州市| 瑞金市| 连州市| 固镇县| 栾城县|