找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Democratizing Risk Governance; Bridging Science, Ex Monica Gattinger Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023

[復制鏈接]
查看: 28069|回復: 55
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:12:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance
副標題Bridging Science, Ex
編輯Monica Gattinger
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/266/265271/265271.mp4
概述Discusses the relationship between science, expertise, deliberation and public values.Includes case studies from three policy fields – energy, genomics, and public health.Features contributions from a
圖書封面Titlebook: Democratizing Risk Governance; Bridging Science, Ex Monica Gattinger Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023
描述.This open access book features contributions from a multidisciplinary team of leading and emerging scholars focused on democratization of risk assessment, management, and communication. The volume identifies and sheds light on key risk governance dilemmas related to public trust, risk perception and public participation. The first part of the book articulates the relationship among science, expertise, deliberation and public values, featuring an in-depth analysis of the concept of ‘motivated reasoning,’ and the role of trust, values and worldviews in understanding and addressing contemporary controversies over risk decision-making. The volume’s second part features eight case studies from three policy fields – energy, genomics, and public health – and a special section dedicated to vaccine decision-making for Covid-19. Chapters analyze the level, nature and mechanisms of public involvement in risk decision-making, assessing its contribution to the effectiveness and legitimacy of decisions. The case studies focus predominantly on Canada, but they draw on global scholarship and are of direct relevance for scholars and practitioners of risk governance in any country.?.
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2023
關鍵詞Risk; governance; Risk governance; risk communication; democratization; emerging technologies; public heal
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24271-7
isbn_softcover978-3-031-24273-1
isbn_ebook978-3-031-24271-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance被引頻次




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance年度引用




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance讀者反饋




書目名稱Democratizing Risk Governance讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:07:35 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:17:49 | 只看該作者
y of decisions. The case studies focus predominantly on Canada, but they draw on global scholarship and are of direct relevance for scholars and practitioners of risk governance in any country.?.978-3-031-24273-1978-3-031-24271-7
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:21:51 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:40:18 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:57:43 | 只看該作者
Science and Values:tween normative and descriptive claims, but because of their logical structures, normative claims cannot provide sole support for descriptive claims, and vice versa. It argues that the second idea is crucially incomplete—that although there are distinctive epistemic values in science, they cannot de
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:01:10 | 只看該作者
The BIAS FREE Framework: A Tool for Science/Technology and Society Education to Increase Science andfying and avoiding biases that derive from social hierarchies by posing 20 analytical questions. The premise of the chapter is that the BFF is a useful tool for educational efforts to enhance risk literacy of scientific and technological advancements including their risk narratives.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:50:55 | 只看該作者
Getting It Right? The Site Selection Process for Canada’s High-level Nuclear Wasteting a location for high-level nuclear waste. After a general introduction to the case, three descriptive sections provide the level of individuals’ affectedness, the types of risk management intervention tools, and the level of democratization in the case. A particular emphasis is on the public con
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:55:59 | 只看該作者
Hydraulic Fracturing in New Brunswick: Trust, Deliberation, and Risk Decision-Makingt leads to better policy outcomes, and demonstrates that it is important to integrate lay knowledge as a fundamental component of risk management practices. The chapter concludes with recommendations to strengthen trust in energy decision-making in Canada.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:47:05 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 07:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
察雅县| 东至县| 新田县| 噶尔县| 达孜县| 孟津县| 华阴市| 庐江县| 威信县| 固始县| 措勤县| 彰化县| 鄄城县| 汝城县| 廉江市| 阳春市| 监利县| 阜阳市| 浦江县| 武川县| 巨野县| 建瓯市| 瑞昌市| 法库县| 庆安县| 锡林郭勒盟| 弋阳县| 肥东县| 梅河口市| 集贤县| 策勒县| 柯坪县| 南溪县| 咸丰县| 长丰县| 武胜县| 迁西县| 平安县| 启东市| 中江县| 肃南|