找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Democracy, Populism, and Truth; Mark Christopher Navin,Richard Nunan Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Democracy and Populism.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: CLOG
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:00:42 | 只看該作者
Reflections on the Root Causes of Outrage Discourse on Social Mediaificant physical, social and economic displacement that has occurred in many post-industrialised countries in recent decades. While outrage discourse is a feature of political discussion on social media in many countries, this essay focuses in particular on developments in the USA and the UK.
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:23:25 | 只看該作者
Identifying Political Participants on Social Media: Conflicts of Epistemic Justice disadvantages associated with more traditional media. It then sets out the epistemological difficulties of both content-regulation and the marketplace of ideas. It concludes with a defense of source transparency, tempered by the need to protect the identities of those who may be endangered by disclosure.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 02:54:10 | 只看該作者
As Maine Goes, So Goes the Nation? Ranked Choice Voting and STV as Antidotes to Tribal Populism. The parallels raise comparable questions for potential application on the national stage. As Maine’s case illustrates, political, statutory, and constitutional hurdles to effective electoral reform movements can be quite serious, but perhaps not insurmountable.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:36:09 | 只看該作者
1873-877X populism.Addresses the relationships between populism and dThis book tackles questions related to democracy, populism and truth, with results that are sure to inform pressing academic and popular debates. It is common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements a
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:54:53 | 只看該作者
Indikationen — Kontraindikationene democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:58:02 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:09:45 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:53:58 | 只看該作者
Democracy, Truth, and Understanding: An Epistemic Argument for Democracystemic arguments. The first is that we attend to other epistemic concepts—notably understanding—which are often left out of the equation. The second is that we also revisit and revise the concept of truth in which the epistemic argument is typically framed.
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:59:46 | 只看該作者
Book 2020s common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements as populist. Some are progressive advocates of greater economic democracy or individual rights, while others are recognizably authoritarian and anti-democratic, even while claiming to defend democracy. What all
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:20:03 | 只看該作者
Democracy and Populisme democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 13:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
民乐县| 磴口县| 惠安县| 张掖市| 建始县| 恭城| 神农架林区| 屯昌县| 库尔勒市| 萝北县| 镇康县| 万荣县| 瑞安市| 沈阳市| 涟水县| 榆树市| 正镶白旗| 顺义区| 西畴县| 柘荣县| 克东县| 炎陵县| 靖宇县| 嘉义县| 仲巴县| 上思县| 辽源市| 灵川县| 井陉县| 株洲县| 普定县| 保康县| 河北省| 开原市| 库车县| 友谊县| 抚顺县| 山西省| 和顺县| 赣榆县| 安泽县|