Titlebook: Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson; Rhizomatic Connectio Keith Robinson Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

Roosevelt

書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson被引頻次




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson年度引用




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson讀者反饋




書目名稱Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Irritate

Whitehead and Deleuze: Thinking the Event,he ways in which things manifest themselves to consciousness, so there are also these ‘exceptional events’ we sometimes experience, like falling in love, or even like the Holocaust (which for Lyotard is a kind of archetype of an event). Such events indeed are extraordinary — they take us by surprise

是貪求

The Emergence of a Speculative Empiricism: Whitehead Reading Bergson,a perpetual growth, a creation pursued without end’.. Certainly, the terms differ: where Bergson refers to duration, vital force and the event, Whitehead, in . ., prefers to speak of becoming, creativity and actual entities. But a common trajectory seems to extend beyond the divergent vocabulary.

sulcus

A Whiteheadian Chaosmos?,meaning and order’; rather, ‘patterns of meaning and order emerge gradually, fitfully, and unevenly from [a] churning multiplicity of value centers’ (Sherburne, 1986, pp. 83, 92). Thus — or so it would seem — the term ‘chaosmology’ is simply a fancy neologism for speculative naturalism, for a cosmol

瑪瑙

北京人起源

北京人起源

gene-therapy

MOCK

n between their concepts, methods and modes of philosophy. Themes are examined in the context of the contrasts, differences and conjunctions - the rhizomatic connections - between their shared concepts.978-0-230-28073-1

osteoclasts