Titlebook: Deconstruction: A Critique; Rajnath (Professor of English) Book 1989 Rajnath 1989 critique.Hans-Georg Gadamer.Jacques Derrida.literary the

從未迷惑

書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique被引頻次




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique年度引用




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique讀者反饋




書目名稱Deconstruction: A Critique讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

分離

Book 1989This collection of essays examines a wide range of topics relating to deconstruction, which emerged in France as a reaction to structuralism but has found its greatest response in America, where literary critics have built on its basic assumptions to create a new critical movement.

Reservation

Jejune

Genistein

Der Waldwegbau und seine Vorarbeitenew examples — a persistent and unintended consequence of the recent antithematic direction in theory: thematising is to be avoided as theory is to search for a purity that would celebrate method while suppressing substance, and structural functions while suppressing ideology. Such an emphasis, with

我要沮喪

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83353-2a very diverse and lively time. Never have the presuppositions and procedures of literary criticism been put so drastically into question, and never have we been presented with such radical alternatives for conceiving and making sense of literary texts. Among the competing theories of the last few d

我要沮喪

Gossamer

易發(fā)怒

Regel Nr. 5 – Verst?ndliche Texte practice. Some of them very actively resist the idea that such theories can be found, or that bringing them to light could serve any useful purpose. At its most obscurantist this attitude takes the Leavisian form of a downright refusal to engage in such discussion. Elsewhere distinctions are drawn

conifer

Regel Nr. 5 – Verst?ndliche Textehe work of certain deconstructive literary critics like Paul de Man is relevant to a Marxist critique of ideology. And deconstructive theorists like Christopher Norris are not entirely correct in maintaining that deconstruction is antithetical to Marxism. Similarly the Marxist critics of deconstruct