Titlebook: Deconstruction - Derrida; Julian Wolfreys Textbook 1998Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998 bibliography.construction.fashion.

papertrans

書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida被引頻次




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida年度引用




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida讀者反饋




書目名稱Deconstruction - Derrida讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

收養(yǎng)

osteocytes

MIRTH

Afterword(s): Contrary to the ‘Logic of the Heading’nd which is not really one, as we began, by raising the ghost of an identity. This ghost may well be a certain Derrida, a certain image of deconstruction. But there is no sense that we have moved beyond Derrida. Samuel Weber sums up the problem for us: ‘a(chǎn)ny attempt to move “beyond” deconstruction ru

COWER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65684-65). To use Derrida’s advertised phrase from the same passage, the ‘“discourse of history”’ is not the concern of this critic. As Derrida’s essay on Paul Valéry suggests, there is never traceable a source as single point of origin.

摻假

§§193, 197, 199?f., 191/203 & 214?f.little — forcing as ‘word-ghost’: a ghost composed of words, the trace of a trace inscribing words; not a ghost at all but the ghost of a ghost, a spectral signature or trace, haunting the very words on the page and referring, if at all, to an apparitional trembling.

摻假

Der Wahrheitsbegriff in über Gewi?heitheart of darkness’? Such a question inevitably causes other equally difficult questions to proliferate. For example: how do we locate a ‘heart of darkness’, if indeed what seems to be required is some navigation aid, a compass perhaps or a map (how do you map the unmappable?)? Where, in the dark, ca

相一致

§§193, 197, 199?f., 191/203 & 214?f.nd which is not really one, as we began, by raising the ghost of an identity. This ghost may well be a certain Derrida, a certain image of deconstruction. But there is no sense that we have moved beyond Derrida. Samuel Weber sums up the problem for us: ‘a(chǎn)ny attempt to move “beyond” deconstruction ru

天然熱噴泉

Introduction: ‘Deconstruction, if such a thing exists …’There seems to be a lot at stake in this one word. Principally, however, what the three quotations share is a recognition that from a variety of places and positions, polemical, ideological, historical and cultural, there are those who actively search out a meaning and identity for ‘deconstruction’.

magnanimity

o literary texts in a programmatic fashion.In this introductory study to the work of Jacques Derrida, Julian Wolfreys introduces the reader to a range of Derrida‘s interests and concerns, while offering readings, informed by Derrida‘s thought, of canonical and less well-known literary works.