Titlebook: Debating Nature‘s Value; The Concept of ‘Natu Victor Anderson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Natural Capita

使入伍

書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value被引頻次




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value年度引用




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value讀者反饋




書目名稱Debating Nature‘s Value讀者反饋學科排名

擴張

legislate

Armory

Paraplegia

,Is the Concept of ‘Natural Capital’ Useful?,d pitfalls of a ‘natural capital’ approach to ensure that a sensible trajectory is being pursued. Outlined in this chapter are some recommendations for a nuanced approach to the conceptualisation of ‘natural capital’ which takes into account the benefits and potential risks.

laceration

How Should We Value Nature?,rotected if we can assess it in monetary terms. This seems appealing—nature has been undervalued for too long. But there are risks and flaws in the Natural Capital approach—the way we experience nature or the simple right of nature to exist cannot be measured in this way. And putting a monetary valu

laceration

蘑菇

Gudgeon

deforestation

,‘Natural Capital’: Ontology or Analogy?,he concept of ‘Natural Capital’ will then be provided, a key reference point being the ‘Five Capitals’ approach in Jonathon Porrit’s 2005 book. I will suggest that what we have in the Five Capitals approach is a series of analogies conceived as a piece of social marketing of sustainability, primaril