找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48896|回復(fù): 48
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:45:27 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Debating Laws
副標(biāo)題Studies on Parliamen
編輯A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/265/264049/264049.mp4
概述Outlines a methodology for analysing and evaluating legislative argumentation in parliament.Includes ten case studies offering a broad overview of the practice of legislative justification.Broadens le
叢書名稱Legisprudence Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice
描述.This book seeks to explore the potential and actual value of parliamentary debates as a source of legislative justification. Drawing on a sample of recent Spanish legislation, the papers collected here analyse (critically) the rationale of several laws or legislative measures as it can be reconstructed from the respective parliamentary discussions. All issues covered have given rise to intense political, legal and social controversy: they range from the combat against gender violence, the legal status of bullfighting, the protection of crime victims and the so-called ‘push-backs’ at the border, to the regulation of euthanasia, the minimum living income, underage girls’ access to abortion, and joint child custody. The volume is organised into two main parts. The first group of case studies adopt a legisprudential perspective and examine parliamentary deliberations in the light of the theory and methodology of legislative justification; the contributions in the second part followapproaches that fall outside – but are largely compatible with –legisprudence, and deal with aspects such as the rhetorical strategies employed by MPs when debating bills, and the role of elected legislators
出版日期Book 2024
關(guān)鍵詞Parliamentary debate; Legislative deliberation; Legisprudence; Justification of legislation; Constitutio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-46729-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-46727-1Series ISSN 2213-2813 Series E-ISSN 2213-2856
issn_series 2213-2813
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Debating Laws影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debating Laws影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debating Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Laws被引頻次




書目名稱Debating Laws被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Laws年度引用




書目名稱Debating Laws年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Laws讀者反饋




書目名稱Debating Laws讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:23:31 | 只看該作者
,Was It Really ‘To No Avail’? The Legislative Deliberations on Underage Girls’ Access to Abortion ink on the ground by reviewing the legislative deliberations on underage girls’ access to abortion held in the Spanish Parliament in 2015—which resulted in the passage of the .. The outcome of this tentative review is ambivalent. On the one hand, in terms of extent (scope and depth) and structure, the
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:10:05 | 只看該作者
Legislative Debates on Death with Dignity and Euthanasia. An Approach to the Spanish Situation, is to analyse the arguments used in the legislative debates. The present chapter undertakes such an analysis from a twofold perspective: firstly, by examining the rationality of those arguments, and secondly, by examining what models of debate shaped the parliamentary discussion of the bill. Knowin
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:55:29 | 只看該作者
Debating on the Rights of Crime Victims: A Legisprudential Examination of the Parliamentary Delibered to the approval of the .. This legislative scenario proves interesting, on the one hand, because the recognition of the rights of victims seems at first glance to be a non-controversial topic; on the other hand, because the Spanish legislature had to implement a European framework directive that
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:28:13 | 只看該作者
Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out, Moroccan-Spanish borders in Ceuta and Melilla. The insufficiency of the reasons MPs adduced in defence of this measure, in my view, makes it very hard to say that these legislative debates were a reasonable source of justification in legisprudential terms: they provide, rather, a ‘non-justification
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:08:27 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:04:20 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:01:42 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:47:37 | 只看該作者
,Minimum Vital Income: A Legislative Debate from the ‘Participant-Observer’ Perspective,liamentary deliberation took place regarding the initially approved Royal Decree-Law and the bill negotiated in the Committee. This chapter uses the concept of rhetoric, as employed by Albert O. Hirschman, to review the distinct theses, recurring narratives, cliches, and metaphors utilized during th
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:17:08 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 15:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
治多县| 灌云县| 确山县| 会泽县| 贵德县| 金堂县| 昭通市| 抚远县| 正镶白旗| 兰坪| 南汇区| 始兴县| 新蔡县| 孟州市| 独山县| 湖南省| 绥芬河市| 维西| 乌鲁木齐县| 安塞县| 平昌县| 商河县| 高碑店市| 蓬安县| 登封市| 芷江| 临夏市| 比如县| 闽侯县| 新田县| 南通市| 金秀| 芮城县| 犍为县| 宣威市| 长沙市| 衡东县| 衢州市| 南京市| 龙江县| 元朗区|