找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating European Citizenship; Rainer Baub?ck Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 European Union.Citize

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: obdurate
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:15:24 | 只看該作者
EU Accession to the ECHR Requires Ensuring the Franchise for EU Citizens in National ElectionsAs rapporteur of the European Parliament on electoral reform, I strongly support the launching of this ECI, and will sign it. Wider legal and political action will surely be necessary at the EU level. And changes to both the primary and secondary law of the EU cannot be obstructed forever.
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:27:19 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:41:28 | 只看該作者
One Cannot Promote Free Movement of EU Citizens and Restrict Their Political ParticipationThe EU legal norms should reflect social practices and EU citizens’ lived encounters. National electoral participation should therefore be made available to all those EU citizens who are emmeshed in the member states of their residence and have been sharing their burdens without complaint for so many years.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:44:06 | 只看該作者
Incremental Changes Are not Enough – Voting Rights Are a Matter of Democratic PrincipleThe right to vote is so fundamental to democracy that any arguments reflecting the difficulties of putting it into effect pale into insignificance. An incremental approach to European citizenship can work, for example in the area of social rights and entitlements, but it is more questionable in the area of political rights.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:21:28 | 只看該作者
Mobile Union Citizens Should Have Portable Voting Rights Within the EUWhen it comes to the problem of disenfranchisement of mobile EU citizens, naturalisation solves too little too late. Because of the specificity of the situation of EU citizens, alternative ways of political inclusion are preferable to naturalisation. I propose an argument for portable political rights for mobile EU citizens.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:13:14 | 只看該作者
Concluding Remarks: Righting Democratic WrongsThe different cases made in this debate for or against our ECI have only strengthened our resolve. There is broad consensus that the current situation is untenable. Let us do all we can to right democratic wrongs and endow European citizens with voting rights wherever they choose to reside in the EU.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 16:36:47 | 只看該作者
Rainer Baub?ckThis open access book covers debates about European citizenship.Presents a wide range of views by legal scholars, political scientists, and political practitioners.Organizes debates as conversations w
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:47:40 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:02:44 | 只看該作者
Debating European Citizenship978-3-319-89905-3Series ISSN 2364-4087 Series E-ISSN 2364-4095
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:13:29 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 10:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
浏阳市| 龙江县| 麦盖提县| 禄劝| 庄浪县| 临泽县| 堆龙德庆县| 沅陵县| 筠连县| 遵义县| 冕宁县| 罗定市| 色达县| 南靖县| 山西省| 淮安市| 蕉岭县| 沭阳县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 抚顺县| 淮滨县| 杭锦后旗| 荔波县| 新田县| 定州市| 黄龙县| 古田县| 勐海县| 高雄县| 资源县| 南华县| 昭苏县| 玉山县| 特克斯县| 莆田市| 河池市| 融水| 高碑店市| 漾濞| 临夏市| 司法|