Titlebook: Debating Divorce in Italy; Marriage and the Mak Mark Seymour Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 fascism.h

阿諛奉承

書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy被引頻次




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy年度引用




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy讀者反饋




書目名稱Debating Divorce in Italy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

defenses

Making Italians, task of unifying the laws of the land. The importance attributed to the family and the regulation of family relationships is indicated by the speed with which the government constituted a special commission to study the way marriage was to be regulated in the new state. On 19 June 1860 the first mi

Enliven

Transfusion

消極詞匯

干旱

,Divorce between Liberalism and Socialism, 1900–1902,e by the occasional publication, and particularly the short-lived journal of 1895–1896, ., the issue was easily obscured by the pressing crises of the fin de siècle. In Italy these crises were particularly painful. Against a background of enduring economic problems, the nation lurched from the banki

干旱

Halfhearted

cringe

,Loris Fortuna and the ,, 1964–1970,at is approaching the coast. Perhaps this change is only perceptible in retrospect—often in history certainty about a coming event is acquired only after it has happened. Yet, the year 1964 does seem to mark a change, the beginning of more concrete hopes. One publication from that year signals this

endocardium

,Let the People Decide, 1970–1974,e piazza in front of Rome’s Pantheon, not far from the parliament itself. The LID caravan had been parked there for several days, and the group had kept up a vigil throughout the Chamber’s final sitting. A fuzzy photograph, appearing on the front page of a pro-divorce newspaper a few days later, cap