Titlebook: Debating Bad Leadership; Reasons and Remedies Anders ?rtenblad Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

Proponent

outset

Background and Introduction: Why Debating Bad Leadership? premises that it rests upon, and its anatomy are introduced. There is also an overview of possible, plausible explanations for the frequent occurrence of bad leaders, as well as an overview of which of these explanations that are touched upon in the various chapters.

Dedication

tic-douloureux

Ethical Failure and Leadership: Treatment and Selectionip positions. In order to understand and prevent ethical failure in leadership, it is not enough to take steps to address and prevent ethical failure among existing leaders. Rather, avoiding ethical failure may also require rethinking the ways that leaders are selected.

生氣地

Why Bad Leaders? A Perspective from WICScandidates for entering positions of leadership. The chapter then presents the WICS theory—wisdom–intelligence–creativity synthesized—and how it applies to bad leadership. Finally, it draws some conclusions, including that the forces of tribalism today are very strong and it may take disasters for people to realize that tribalism is a dead end.

barium-study

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64891-9 morality. We offer a framework that clarifies an understanding of leadership that distinguishes a . (effective) from a . (moral) dimension. Various types of good and bad leaders—integral, ineffectual, shadow, and dark—can be placed within this framework.

paleolithic

The Years of Living Dangerouslyearch into the practices, the effects and the causes of destructive leadership. It suggests that the main value of shining a light on toxic leadership is to alert those who construct and operate corporate structures and processes to take action to prevent, minimize or forestall the damage it may cause.

Clinch

浪蕩子

Paul Collaer,Jane Hohfeld Galanteite their negative impact); and the assessment and decision process followers use when they support leaders (it is often subjective and cognitively biased and irrational). A typology of “the good, the bad, and the ugly leaders” summarizes how to explain followers’ choices of leaders.

Junction

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56351-5pect to follow in many situations and willingly empower leaders. Empowering leaders also occurs because of exchanges between leaders and followers whereby leaders satisfy follower needs in return for legitimacy and power. One important facet of this exchange is leaders boosting follower sense of self-worth in exchange for power.