找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debates on Colonial Genocide in the 21st Century; Marouf‘Hasian Jr. Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 街道
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:40:24 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:21:49 | 只看該作者
Book 2020rsations about apologies and other restorative justice acts. This work will be of interest to a wide range of audiences including researchers, scholars, graduate students, and policy makers in the fields of political history, genocide studies, and political science. .
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:39:02 | 只看該作者
Remembering and Forgetting the Tasmanian Genocide,e adamant that it is not the exact numbers who die that determines whether certain colonial acts constitute a genocide. The chapter puts on display evidence from public and academic sources to show that further debate is needed about the attempted “extirpation” of the Tasmanians.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:05:09 | 只看該作者
The Indigeneity Wars: Academic and Public Refusals to Recognize Al-Nakba,at some type of ethnic cleansing had taken place during the 1948 expulsions. Using the work of writers such as Ilan Pappé and Benny Morris as touchstones, the author puts on display the varied academic, legal, political, and military reasons why so few want to include the Nakba in the traditional canons of genocidal studies.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:51:29 | 只看該作者
,Opening Up the “Pandora’s Box” That Comes with Academic, Legal, and Public Acknowledgments of “Coloognized this might lead to litigation like the British settlements with former Mau Mau fighters. The author argues that these expressed anxieties do not provide sufficient warrants for closing off needed debates about colonial genocides or restorative justice for indigenous survivors.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:16:08 | 只看該作者
Figuration in Shelley and Dantestudies of “modern” genocides. The author contends that twenty-first-century scholars and public care very deeply about apologies, expressions of regret, the repatriation of remains, and reparations for colonial wrongdoing, and that we need more nuanced “decolonizing” debates about these topics. Thi
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:06:31 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:27:11 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:55:25 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:39:08 | 只看該作者
Marouf‘Hasian Jr.Provides a detailed critical analysis of some of academic and journalistic debates on colonial genocide.Analyzes two major cases studies of genocide, the Tasmanian genocide and the Nakba.Presents the
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 14:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
诸城市| 安福县| 温宿县| 南溪县| 平定县| 托克逊县| 林口县| 锡林浩特市| 天全县| 嘉兴市| 乐业县| 和平区| 穆棱市| 望都县| 佳木斯市| 凌海市| 五原县| 达拉特旗| 阿城市| 新余市| 榕江县| 咸阳市| 会宁县| 五家渠市| 贵港市| 东山县| 秀山| 永川市| 九江市| 宕昌县| 常宁市| 焦作市| 抚松县| 上犹县| 八宿县| 通化县| 樟树市| 明溪县| 娄底市| 盐亭县| 景东|