Titlebook: Death, Burial and Commemoration in Ireland, 1550-1650; Clodagh Tait Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limit

neologism

Lisa Bornewasser,Stephanie Kath-Schorrre of our doctors to cure us, the failure of our organs as we die.. Medieval and early modern populations had a far less medicalised view of such matters. Disease and death were the will of God and, to those who believed in the teachings of the churches, the moment of death itself was merely a stepp

FADE

Wenjing Li,Yanwei Cao,Renjun Peithe corpse (before it begins to decay), while acknowledging (or denying) the personal and social identities of the deceased person through the provision of appropriate ritual activity. This chapter thus deals both with the practicalities of the disposal of the dead in early modern Ireland, in so far

troponins

尊重

https://doi.org/10.37307/b.978-3-503-23602-2 very well, until we realise that she was already dead, and had been interred, probably in Dundalk, in the early 1590s. What Bellew was proposing was that she be exhumed and reburied in the new grave.. While today, as one anthropologist points out, we are ‘horrified at the disturbing of bodies’, oth

承認(rèn)

CHOKE

繞著哥哥問

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0062-8d to themselves and to others, whether loved or despised, after death? To what extent did Christian beliefs in the immortality of the soul and its reward or punishment after death impinge on the consciousness and actions of the living? This chapter is largely based on sources which reveal personal i

減去

多樣

大吃大喝