Titlebook: Data-processing in phytosociology; Report on the activi Eddy Maarel,László Orlóci,Sandro Pignatti Book 1980 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The

卜聞

大方一點(diǎn)

organic-matrix

Toma? Pisanski,Brigitte Servatiusffusion in ecology is due to the work of Goodall (1954), Dagnelie (1960), van Groenewoud (1965), Orlóci (1966, 1973), Austin & Orlóci (1966), Ivimey-Cook & Proctor (1967), van der Maarel (1969), and others. Although PCA is a statistical method, in ecology it serves as an ordination technique in indi

新鮮

萬神殿

Comparative Territorial Politicshich are expressed in different ways. The use of compound terms such as population structure, age structure, ecological structure, competitive structure, production structure, size-class structure, dynamic structure, are more or less common in the literature. In texts describing vegetation structure

致詞

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292543rentiating them uses mostly subjective regrouping of relevés and species in the table and the rewriting of the table. The use of computers for the generation of ordered phytosociological tables is so far out of reach for most phytosociologists. The use of even simple numerical techniques without the

取之不竭

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292543 information required to produce a short list of species to economize the analysis without unduly distorting the results. But the weights supplied have relevance only in the population for which they were determined. As further limitation, they can be applied as logical input only in certain methods

有罪

最有利

Roma Harris,Nadine Wathen,Sally Wyattnquet (1964) method along the lines developed by R. Tüxen and collaborators in the 1930’s (which were first described in detail by Ellenberg 1956, see also Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974), many similar programs have been devised. They have been briefly reviewed by Westhoff & van der Maarel (1973),

發(fā)芽