Titlebook: D. H. Lawrence in Italy and England; George Donaldson (Lecturer in English),Mara Kalnin Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmil

linguistics

Lawrence and Modernism, In general, it badly skews the literary history, and in particular, it marginalises the achievement of D. H. Lawrence.. This is not the place to pursue the general argument, which would need to include the work of Forster, Woolf, Ford, Wells and Bennett, but for Lawrence alone, the objection to ‘Mo

craving

,Trusting Lawrence the Artist in Italy: , — and Schubert, regretfully, ‘ no thanks: my doctor’s very firm’. And another man added (I should have mentioned, apologetically, that these were all men), ‘we’ve been meeting here regularly for twenty years. Then, we only talked about women. Ten years later, it was money. Nowadays, all we ever talk about is illne

HAWK

看法等

Deadpan

調(diào)情

Cambridge and Italy: Lawrence, Wittgenstein and Forms of Life, of Leavis and Wittgenstein who did meet yet failed to recognise the complementary nature of their intellectual preoccupations.. That was a significantly failed relationship, like that of Stephen Dedalus and Leopold Bloom or of Rupert Birkin and Gerald Crich. By the same token, however, Lawrence and

Kinetic

Lawrence, Florence and Theft: , of Biographical Enquiry,next ten I am beginning to rely on key words to pick up the gist. After that, I am reduced to observing their body language, sustaining my own role with affirmative nods, and living in fear of some such sudden enquiry as, ‘So you do agree, then, that chopping off the hands of these people would be t

季雨

不感興趣

,Rage against the Murrys: ‘Inexplicable’ or ‘Psychopathic’?,excusable. Anthony Alpers, biographer of Mansfield, makes the fair charge that no Lawrence biographer has ever been able to explain it. A few years ago, I sat in a meeting of the D. H. Lawrence society and heard a psycho-therapist state that it could only be called ‘psychopathic’.. Hence my title. M

Enthralling

Lawrence and Modernism,several of his tales, short and long. To take a striking example, in . (1976), an influential assemblage of essays edited by Malcolm Bradbury and James MacFarlane, Lawrence’s achievement as a novelist is mentioned only three times. Two of these consist of passing references to his handling of ‘chara