Titlebook: Constitutionalism and Democracy; The Supreme Court Po George Skouras Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

延展

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Constitutionalism and Democracy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

aphasia

Book 2024an political institutions...The book’s approach is to use an interdisciplinary methodology by which it weaves a linear and non-linear aspects of inquiry. The book will be of interested to a broad readership, including those working in the fields of (constitutional) law, legal history. political philosophy, political science and political theory..

信條

虛假

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8ion of establishing the power of judicial review in England was over. The British refused to allow their judges to serve as the final arbiters of the law. Any natural rights would need to be agreed and cleared by Parliament. With the execution of Charles I, England began its long march of Parliament

precede

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8mas Jefferson played important roles in the protection of property generally. But it was ultimately Alexander Hamilton that out maneuvered both of them in securing the power of the judiciary, as the central authority and least democratic institution, as the powerhouse of constitutional interpretatio

nauseate

nauseate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8sible for an America that was opening up under the Jacksonian presidency. Wilson might have learned the lessons that theoretical textbooks, written by professors of democracy, may be an illusion once they step outside the academy and leave their armchair theorizing behind only to discover the brutal

水槽

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8s. Reason has been held as the “gold” standard in many domains of inquiry and especially in the law..How we interpret the “l(fā)etter” of the law—that is by way of some “neutral” standard, by originalism or by or some other way—it always rebounds to the ground conditions. Language is a funny business. T

Graves’-disease

Compass