Titlebook: Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand; An Alternative Frame Pierangelo Garegnani,Roberto Ciccone Book 2024 The Editor(

intensify

書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand被引頻次




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand年度引用




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand讀者反饋




書目名稱Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

擦試不掉

Paleontology

誘使

Pranav Kumar Seerala,Sridhar Krishnanversies on the subject. It focuses on the problem of measuring capital independently of distribution, present in the classical approach no less than in the later one. It is indeed contended that that problem is what lies at the basis of the difficulties which Ricardo and Marx met in their theory of

使迷醉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28658-7tury ultimately rely, has been the object of considerable discussion in recent years. As is well known, these theories had their origin in a reformulation in terms of homogeneous land and “intensive” margins, of the Malthusian theory of rent.

無價值

D. KrishnaSri,P. Suja,Shikha Tripathi to a change in the rate of profits, to become profitable again when the profit rate changes further in the same direction. We first point out where Levhari’s argument fails and then show, by means of a numerical example, that such a ‘return’, or ‘switch-back’, of a production system is possible und

無價值

壓倒性勝利

Digital Display Control Using Automationion through investment demand and savings supply. With the help of a simple model (the same one used by Hahn, 1982, to counter the capital theory critique), the paper brings out the equality of saving and investment decisions implied, for each period, in an intertemporal equilibrium. This makes it p

NIL

Shivendra Singh,Shajulin Benedictinfluencing the ‘relative scarcity’ of the ‘factors of production’. It follows that in the approach of Adam Smith and Ricardo, who did not explain distribution in this way, those functions would play no role in determining relative prices. These conclusions help to distinguish the neoclassical notio

magnanimity

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systemseory of value which led Ricardo and Marx to rely on the quantities of labour ‘embodied’ in the commodities, in Marx integated by the introduction of the prices of production. The error Marx makes with regard to the latter is then traceable to the superimposition of two equivalent but distinct method