Titlebook: Cross-Border Mergers; EU Perspectives and Thomas Papadopoulos Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 European Company Law.Harmoniza

fiscal

是限制

Cross-Border Mergers: The Danish ExperienceDanish rules that provide protection for creditors and minority shareholders in the non-surviving limited company. The Danish provisions on cross-border mergers make up the basis for the Danish provision on transfer of the seat, and consequently the chapter closes with a short presentation of the Da

強(qiáng)制性

insurrection

不確定

Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhauoughout the EU. Hence, companies can, at least in theory, re-incorporate from a member state to another. Despite this recent case law, however, only some member states allow cross-border re-incorporations by way of relocation of registered office, while many other either do not regulate this transac

使絕緣

Christina Hoferdt,Hans Sünderhaunew breed of hedge funds which specialize in so-called appraisal arbitrage has resulted in a spectacular increase in appraisal petitions in connection with M&A transactions in the US and has led to calls for a tighter regulation of the appraisal remedy. Despite the growing popularity of appraisal ri

vascular

time. However, as this paper shows, the effect of this form of corporate transformation on shareholder litigation remains a grey area..Despite the fact that the—now codified—3rd Company Law Directive demands that Member States provide for remedy of shareholders’ loss, in a national context, EU law,

frivolous

ropean legislature decided to resolve it by simply incorporating into MAR the ECJ case law on the notion of inside information. At first glance, the new legal framework appears to provide legal certainty in European capital market law. However, the notion of inside information and the disclosure obl

Cloudburst

7/1132). These rules are not alone in pursuing this aim, as the takeover bid directive (Directive 2004/25/EC) also contributes to fostering cross-border combinations of European firms. While grounded on comparable regulatory aims, the two set of rules display remarkable differences. These are only i