Titlebook: Critical Studies in Private Law; A Treatise on Need-R Thomas Wilhelmsson Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1992 dogmatics.lega

thyroidectomy

書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law被引頻次




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law年度引用




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Critical Studies in Private Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

膠狀

起來了

Social Force Majeure,er it is for the legal decision-maker to use the new instruments. In this chapter it will be shown how such a new, relatively precise legal principle can be created on the basis of a fragmented concrete legal material.

Explosive

cent of the attack of the American realists some decades earlier on traditional “l(fā)aw in books”.. At the same time, critical discussion in the Nordic countries was also receiving strong impulses from Marxist legal theory.

我要威脅

Introduction,cent of the attack of the American realists some decades earlier on traditional “l(fā)aw in books”.. At the same time, critical discussion in the Nordic countries was also receiving strong impulses from Marxist legal theory.

Frisky

Book 1992e analysis is the recognition ofcontradictions within the legal order. In this respect the theory mayuse the experience of both American Critical Legal Studies and theGerman attempts to formulate a legal theory for the social state. Thekey for understanding how the contradictory concrete legal mater

Frisky

coddle

,“General Principles” as the Primary Object of Alternative Studies,cs systematizes its research object. This does not mean systematization in a merely pedagogical sense, but something more: the general principles and concepts of the legal order or the relevant branch of law stand at the centre of interest. These are the instruments with whose help the systematizati

watertight,

ARC

Towards Need-Oriented General Principles,have to some extent, as we saw in Chapter IV, been supplemented with function-related concepts such as ‘consumer’ and with ability-oriented concepts such as ‘expert’. The cases within the law of obligations where it has been possible to consider a party’s concrete economic and social needs have unti