找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Criminal Liability of Political Decision-Makers; A Comparative Perspe Frank Zimmermann Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Roosevelt
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:12:22 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:18:29 | 只看該作者
A Comparative Analysis of Criminal Laws Protecting Public Budgets: Can Bad Political Decisions Be Cr far as the ‘if-and-what question’ of the respective project is concerned. Basically, two legislative models are conceivable: some states have criminalised breaches of official duties. In most of the legal systems analysed, by contrast, only property offences could potentially capture such cases. Ul
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:41:35 | 只看該作者
Criminal Responsibility of Political Decision-Makers and Bribery-Related Offences: A Brief Comparatid their coverage to authorities that used to be excluded from it; the regulation of campaign finance and political candidates’ behaviour also seems to be on the rise; the implementation of concepts that used to be controversial in some constitutional systems, such as trading in influence, seems to b
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:48:16 | 只看該作者
A Comparative Analysis of Special Sanctions Applicable to Political Decision-Makerseports was a questionnaire that included a separate section on ‘special sanctions applicable to politicians’. It should be noted that certain national characteristics are largely not accounted for (e.g., the question of who is considered a political decision-maker), but they are instead dealt with i
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:53:00 | 只看該作者
Corruption as Disloyalty?e different behaviours that can plausibly be considered corrupt. And second, it is necessary to be clear not only about what harm corruption produces but also what its moral wrong consists in, and what is the degree of its moral wrong according to the moral typology of each kind of corrupt conduct.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:10:58 | 只看該作者
Frank ZimmermannFirst comprehensive analysis of the criminal liability of political decision makers in a democratic state.Adds a comparative law perspective to the (so far) purely national discussion about criminal l
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:29:45 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:52:53 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52051-3Criminal law; Politicians; Corruption; Public households; Conflict of interest; Decision maker; Democracy;
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:06:29 | 只看該作者
978-3-319-84807-5Springer International Publishing AG 2017
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:38:05 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 10:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
罗定市| 突泉县| 黄山市| 黑山县| 淮北市| 西藏| 无极县| 故城县| 元阳县| 芒康县| 色达县| 肇东市| 雅江县| 崇礼县| 冷水江市| 滦南县| 海丰县| 平和县| 曲松县| 晋城| 石狮市| 蓬溪县| 台东市| 海林市| 曲靖市| 闽清县| 凤山县| 大关县| 巴青县| 盐边县| 宾川县| 凤翔县| 济源市| 安仁县| 九寨沟县| 尚义县| 丹寨县| 宁陕县| 石棉县| 宣威市| 安福县|