Titlebook: Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History; Hall Gardner Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015 Cr

驅(qū)逐

書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History被引頻次




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History年度引用




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History讀者反饋




書目名稱Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

打火石

Meager

Genesis of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict,een two equal sovereign states over the division of financial assets, resources, territory, as well as nuclear and conventional weaponry. At that time, in the period from 1991 to 1994, Washington and Moscow had largely worked in tandem to pressure Ukraine, along with Belarus and Kazakhstan, to give

斷言

Soviet Collapse and the Russia-Ukraine Conflict,imea to Ukraine. Khrushchev’s decision was based on the argument that both Ukraine and Crimea were agricultural areas. But more important, Khrushchev, who hoped to build upon Lenin’s earlier rapprochement with Ukrainian nationalists, had ostensibly hoped to make amends for the brutal treatment of th

冰雹

Origins of the Russian Backlash,urity Service (FSB), took the helm, with strong backing from many Russian oligarchs, who were made billionaires during Yeltsin’s . (loans for shares) privatization process and who had fooled themselves into believing they could control Putin. (One could argue that this was also the case for Hitler,

conflate

Uneven Polycentrism and the Global Crisis, not so gradually shifted away from an essentially bicentric US-Soviet system and toward a new polycentrism that is characterized by the rise of differing (and shifting) centers of decision making with highly uneven degrees of power and influence.. Due to the fact that there are now multiple major a

conflate

A Cross-Historical Method,-Japanese-Indian relations that could result in deeper friction and crisis? Or can the United States and Europe adopt a different position that could permit Russia to gradually reintegrate itself into a US-European alliance and political-economic network, thus reducing the real chances of a more int

殺子女者

Why Major-Power War Is Still Possible, Though , Inevitable!,eral theory. Fukuyama’s “end of history” arguments had been preceded by the obsolescence-of-war theories of Norman Angel, presented in . (1910), and updated by John Mueller among others, who argued that the expense of war preparations and the benefits of free trade, as well as the destruction and in

窩轉(zhuǎn)脊椎動(dòng)物

延期