Titlebook: Credit Ratings and Sovereign Debt; The Political Econom Bartholomew Paudyn Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

evanescent

VALID

arrhythmic

可能性

Crisis and Control,se, game theoretics (see Hollis 1998; Nash 1950; Putnam 1988; von Neumann and Morgenstern 1944) have been widely applied in numerous forms, and across multiple disciplines, to explain various scenarios where interactions depend on some degree of confidence in another actor. Overstretching rationalit

運(yùn)動(dòng)的我

commensurate

Rating Performativity, separate from politics or society, with its own distinct laws and causal dynamics, is being disturbed by a burgeoning critical scholarship (Callon 1998; Knorr Cetina and Preda 2005; Langley 2008a; MacKenzie 2006), which ‘suggests that processes of knowledge and interpretation do not exist in additi

comely

Epistocracy versus Democracy,uncertainty and performativity. Acquainted with this knowledge, and equipped with the necessary analytical tools to problematize credit ratings, we are in a better position to understand how the problem of sovereign creditworthiness, and thus the ratings space, is constituted through its (calculativ

基因組

召集

beta-carotene

Epistocracy versus Democracy,censured in favor of normalizing mathematical/risk models. Rather than ontologically predetermined, however, it is through the discursive practice of rating risk — and all the speculative investment activities which it enables — that a neoliberal politics of limits materializes. Timothy Mitchell (1998: 92) reminds us that: