找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃，訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology; Apollo M. Nkwake Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 55547|回復(fù): 47
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:44:33 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology
編輯Apollo M. Nkwake
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/240/239622/239622.mp4
概述Provides practical tools to guide systematic choice and documentation of the appropriate evaluation methods for development programs.Analyzes assumptions underlying methodological choices in evaluatio
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology; Apollo M. Nkwake Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swi
描述.This book focuses on assumptions underlying methods choice in program evaluation. Credible program evaluation extends beyond the accuracy of research designs to include arguments justifying the appropriateness of methods. An important part of this justification is explaining the assumptions made about the validity of methods. This book provides a framework for understanding methodological assumptions, identifying the decisions made at each stage of the evaluation process, the major forms of validity affected by those decisions, and the preconditions for and assumptions about those validities. .Though the selection of appropriate research methodology is not a new topic within social development research, previous publications suggest only advantages and disadvantages of using various methods and when to use them. This book goes beyond other publications to analyze the assumptions underlying actual methodological choices in evaluation studies and how these eventually influence evaluation quality. The analysis offered is supported by a collation of assumptions collected from a case study of 34 evaluations. Due to its in-depth analysis, strong theoretical basis, and practice examples,
出版日期Book 2015
關(guān)鍵詞International Development Program Evaluation; International Development Programs; International Progra
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19021-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-34464-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-19021-1
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:18:36 | 只看該作者
Credible Methodology,about the credibility of evidence and the methodologies and methods used to generate it. Justifying the appropriateness of methods and explaining assumptions about their validity is a critical part of methodological credibility. Validity comes from the accuracy of methods in depicting reality and th
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:26:12 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:08:05 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:46:09 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:40:27 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:01:55 | 只看該作者
Validity in Evaluation Utilization,h evaluation results address values to which major stakeholders (or audiences) subscribe. The major form of validity affected at this stage is consequential validity, meaning the extent to which information needs and priorities of major stakeholders are addressed by evaluation results, and the likel
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:46:20 | 只看該作者
Validity in Performance Measurement,utputs, outcomes, and impacts. This information enables stakeholders to take timely corrective action and increase the likelihood for program success. Effective performance measurement largely depends on the use of appropriate indicators. Indicators are operationalization of program results (outcome
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:16:27 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:28:09 | 只看該作者
ts of evaluation practice—behavioral, competence, utilization, industrial, and methodological—are identified based on the common attributes of professions. Methodology includes the application of methods, procedures, and tools in research. Competence refers to the capacity of evaluators (micro-level
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 12:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
贡嘎县| 平定县| 武宣县| 正宁县| 达孜县| 和龙市| 桐庐县| 永和县| 肇源县| 武夷山市| 项城市| 康定县| 水城县| 威远县| 时尚| 策勒县| 双桥区| 鄢陵县| 长葛市| 彭水| 南雄市| 宣城市| 同仁县| 禹州市| 任丘市| 且末县| 监利县| 屯留县| 木兰县| 宜宾市| 观塘区| 兰溪市| 三亚市| 澳门| 乐清市| 禹城市| 株洲县| 嘉鱼县| 封丘县| 河南省| 铜山县|