Titlebook: Could there have been Nothing?; Against Metaphysical Geraldine Coggins Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

專家

書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?被引頻次




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?年度引用




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?讀者反饋




書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?讀者反饋學科排名

預示

平常

熱烈的歡迎

率直

The Metaphysics of Subtraction,3) is in doubt. In the previous chapter we considered whether the premises of the subtraction argument are true or not. In this chapter I want to look critically at the underlying argumentative approach used in all versions of the subtraction argument.

拍下盜公款

拍下盜公款

sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.

極為憤怒

Possible Worlds,sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.

遍及

獨行者

Horst-Dieter Gasde,Waltraud Paul these criticisms are, as far as possible, avoided. In parallel with this I will be considering the arguments of those philosophers who disagree with metaphysical nihilism. We will see how the subtraction argument in this, its strongest form, fares against these criticisms.