找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure; A Comparative Study Mathias Reimann Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Changes

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 43695|回復(fù): 58
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:52:27 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure
副標(biāo)題A Comparative Study
編輯Mathias Reimann
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/239/238991/238991.mp4
概述Provides a broad and diverse picture of cost and fee allocation rules globally.A unique insight representing more than 60% of the world population.Invaluable guide to academics and practitioners on th
叢書(shū)名稱Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure; A Comparative Study Mathias Reimann Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Changes
描述.The volume describes and analyzes how the costs of litigation in civil procedure are distributed in key countries around the world. It compares the various approaches, draws general conclusions from that comparison, and presents global trends as well as common problems and solutions. In particular, the book deals with three principal questions: First, who pays for civil litigation costs, i.e., to what extent do losers have to make winners whole? Second, how much money is at stake, i.e., how expensive is civil litigation in the respective jurisdictions? And third, whose money is ultimately spent, i.e., how are civil litigation costs distributed through mechanisms like legal aid, litigation insurance, collective actions, and success oriented fees? Inter alia, the study reveals a general trend towards deregulation of lawyer fees as well as a substantial correlation between the burden of litigation costs and membership of a jurisdiction in the civil and common law families..This study is the result of the XVIIIth World Congress of Comparative Law held under the auspices of the International Academy of Comparative Law..
出版日期Book 2012
關(guān)鍵詞Changes of Success in Litigation; Civil Procedure; Comparative Law; Cost Allocation; Cost Fee Regimes in
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2263-7
isbn_softcover978-94-007-6345-6
isbn_ebook978-94-007-2263-7Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:25:52 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:57:43 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:19:13 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:17:11 | 只看該作者
Attorney Fee Arrangements Really Matter in Terms of Access to Justice in Koreat on Costs for Civil Procedure, and that Filing Fees Rules and Rules Regarding Attorney Fees be incorporated into the Rules of Costs for Civil Procedure. I also provide some comments on contingency fee arrangements and pro se litigation.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:01:22 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:48:10 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:36:13 | 只看該作者
Wolfgang Glatzer,Werner Hübingerthe area of legal services. In addition, there are legislative changes (i.e., the re-codification of the whole private law) as well as changes in court practice (i.e., formal as well as spontaneous Europeanization of Czech private law) that have made the outcome of court proceedings difficult to pre
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:49:46 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:48:18 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 21:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
铅山县| 通许县| 聂拉木县| 五华县| 连江县| 麻栗坡县| 凤阳县| 兴山县| 涟源市| 循化| 宁远县| 卓尼县| 邻水| 徐闻县| 金门县| 全椒县| 澎湖县| 汝南县| 保德县| 航空| 綦江县| 邵武市| 广汉市| 饶河县| 全州县| 永胜县| 柳河县| 安龙县| 东方市| 巴彦淖尔市| 灌南县| 郯城县| 常德市| 凤山市| 宽甸| 安国市| 顺平县| 定结县| 弥渡县| 北海市| 开封市|