Titlebook: Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity; In the Aftermath of M. V. Dougherty Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

etiquette

極肥胖

2212-9529 e indispensable roles for rectifying the harms of academic pThis volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishe

咯咯笑

可憎

解決

Introduction,s the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. The correction of the scholarly record for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has

妨礙議事

Hangar

What Is Academic Plagiarism?,grity, I propose that academic plagiarism has been committed when there is: (1) a non-trivial appropriation of words, images, or formulas, (2) with inadequate credit, (3) that generates an appearance of original authorship, (4) in a discrete item belonging to the scholarly record. This approach is s

懸崖

A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy, them are many. Some of the most respected publishing houses in philosophy have recently faced the issue of having published plagiarized material. The chapter uses a specific context of serial plagiarism involving 43 articles and book chapters by one author of record as a test case. The various resp

遍及

Academic Whistleblowing,uals who disclose evidence of suspected plagiarism are often subject to considerable backlash. To be sure, the evidence they provide, even when impeccable, can create a significant workload of verification for editors and publishers, as well as for research integrity officers at the institutional ho

內行

Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases,book chapters for one author of record. As the publications divide into those in philosophy and those in health communication, a comparison is possible between the manner in which different disciplines respond to evidence of suspected plagiarism. Using news reports as well as publicly issued stateme